<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Delivering Quality &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markdeepwell.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markdeepwell.com</link>
	<description>A Software Developers View of the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Click-to-Run Software</title>
		<link>http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/11/click-to-run-software/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/11/click-to-run-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[click-to-run]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdeepwell.com/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Microsoft launching a click-to-run version of Microsoft Office 2010, I can&#8217;t help but think what a great idea it is. Many applications are moving to the web and I do see the web as the future of software development, but I think there is still a need for traditional applications written in a compiled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Microsoft launching a <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/office2010/archive/2009/11/06/click-to-run-delivering-office-in-the-21st-century.aspx">click-to-run</a> version of Microsoft Office 2010, I can&#8217;t help but think what a great idea it is. Many applications are moving to the web and I do see the web as the future of software development, but I think there is still a need for traditional applications written in a compiled language.</p>
<p>Click-to-run works by a user clicking on  a website link, which then runs an small program to download the latest version of the application. When that&#8217;s completed the application starts up for the user. With no install process and no worrying if an existing version of Office is already installed, it&#8217;s  quite a nice scenario for the user.</p>
<p>The application download process definitely seems to be the worst part of click-to-run at the moment. On average it will take about 5 minutes to download the application, but that can certainly be improved.</p>
<p>While similar, Office 2010 doesn&#8217;t compare to Google Office. Yes the online office suite from Google does 95% of things you&#8217;ll ever need, but the last few percentage points have some critical features that are required in the workplace.</p>
<p>Aside from an office suite, I can see computer game demos as being prime click-to-run software. Software publisher could also use it to allow customers to <strong>try before you buy</strong>. This has rarely been said over the last few years, but hopefully other companies take a cue from Microsoft in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/11/click-to-run-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/06/future-of-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/06/future-of-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdeepwell.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the future of technology and our digital toys? The future is big screens. Digital screens, like LCDs that are a thin as paper and a large as you wall. Heck, they&#8217;re probably even on your wall. Ubiquitous advertisements. Why? They appear in games, they appear in product placements on all the new movies. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the future of technology and our digital toys?</p>
<ul>
<li>The future is <strong>big screens</strong>. Digital screens, like LCDs that are a thin as paper and a large as you wall. Heck, they&#8217;re probably even on your wall.</li>
<li><strong>Ubiquitous advertisements</strong>. Why? They appear in games, they appear in product placements on all the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1055369/">new movies</a>. Google is funded by advertisements on free web applications; their whole business strategy is to move more services onto the web so more people are available to watch and click on advertisements.</li>
<li><strong>Mobile</strong>. Remember when Microsoft was pushing so big hard to attract more <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8To-6VIJZRE">developers</a> to its platform? The mobile future is an even larger wave that isn&#8217;t even being pushed very hard by Microsoft. Having instant access to your email, documents, entertainment, and web browsing will be possible through smart phones, <a href="http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/reviews/2009/06/ars-palm-pre-review.ars">Palm Pre</a> anyone, or iPhone? A few more years, notebook computers will be relics, too heavy and clunky when everything you could possibly need is on your mobile phone.</li>
</ul>
<p>The funny thing is, most of this is available now.</p>
<p>The future is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/06/future-of-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
