<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fall 2009 Web Browser Outlook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/09/fall-2009-web-browser-outlook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/09/fall-2009-web-browser-outlook/</link>
	<description>A Software Developers View of the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:15:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/09/fall-2009-web-browser-outlook/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 04:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdeepwell.com/?p=136#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Midori isn&#039;t a major player.
Internet Explorer IS going away.
Balances are shifting - Chromium is superb, Opera 10 is excellent, and Firefox is a swiss army knife.

Firefox can&#039;t go away, but the others can fight it out between themselves.

The only one that doesn&#039;t enter the equation for me is Internet Explorer because it is the Microsoft tool for domination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Midori isn&#8217;t a major player.<br />
Internet Explorer IS going away.<br />
Balances are shifting &#8211; Chromium is superb, Opera 10 is excellent, and Firefox is a swiss army knife.</p>
<p>Firefox can&#8217;t go away, but the others can fight it out between themselves.</p>
<p>The only one that doesn&#8217;t enter the equation for me is Internet Explorer because it is the Microsoft tool for domination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orlando</title>
		<link>http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/09/fall-2009-web-browser-outlook/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>orlando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdeepwell.com/?p=136#comment-30</guid>
		<description>tanstaaf

correcting my sentence:

&quot;Until now ( 09/30/2009 ), there are no public and positive facts that invalidate the following affirmation: Microsoft is not interested in the progress of HTML 5. But perhaps Steve Ballmer is thinking right now: &#039;i would like to advance HTML5, yeah! i will talk with the IE team now!&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tanstaaf</p>
<p>correcting my sentence:</p>
<p>&#8220;Until now ( 09/30/2009 ), there are no public and positive facts that invalidate the following affirmation: Microsoft is not interested in the progress of HTML 5. But perhaps Steve Ballmer is thinking right now: &#8216;i would like to advance HTML5, yeah! i will talk with the IE team now!&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanstaafl</title>
		<link>http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/09/fall-2009-web-browser-outlook/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanstaafl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdeepwell.com/?p=136#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using Chrome as my primary.  Fast and effortless.  Firefox is just too stodgy--glad to hear they are focusing on startup performance.  However, even if it was fast, I think I like the UI of chrome better now.  It will be a tough sell to get me back to firefox.

Orlando:  Ascribing motivation is not helpful--focus on behavior.  In other words, SVG is not supported currently.  That&#039;s a statement of behavior.  &quot;Not interested&quot; is a hard claim to substantiate unless you are on Microsoft&#039;s BOD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using Chrome as my primary.  Fast and effortless.  Firefox is just too stodgy&#8211;glad to hear they are focusing on startup performance.  However, even if it was fast, I think I like the UI of chrome better now.  It will be a tough sell to get me back to firefox.</p>
<p>Orlando:  Ascribing motivation is not helpful&#8211;focus on behavior.  In other words, SVG is not supported currently.  That&#8217;s a statement of behavior.  &#8220;Not interested&#8221; is a hard claim to substantiate unless you are on Microsoft&#8217;s BOD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/09/fall-2009-web-browser-outlook/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdeepwell.com/?p=136#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll suggest Ti-Took (titook.net) as well. A sefe web browsing platform with a built-in web browser based on Google Chrome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll suggest Ti-Took (titook.net) as well. A sefe web browsing platform with a built-in web browser based on Google Chrome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madnessjack</title>
		<link>http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/09/fall-2009-web-browser-outlook/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>madnessjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdeepwell.com/?p=136#comment-26</guid>
		<description>IE is the default for the majority of users. It doesn&#039;t matter if we like it or not, it&#039;s not going away.

I would also like to point out that HTML5 is a draft so we shouldn&#039;t expect it to be in browsers, to start using it now would be foolish because the spec could change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE is the default for the majority of users. It doesn&#8217;t matter if we like it or not, it&#8217;s not going away.</p>
<p>I would also like to point out that HTML5 is a draft so we shouldn&#8217;t expect it to be in browsers, to start using it now would be foolish because the spec could change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orlando</title>
		<link>http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/09/fall-2009-web-browser-outlook/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>orlando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdeepwell.com/?p=136#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Microsot is not interested in the progress of HTML 5. Examples:

. SVG not supported
. ACID 3 terribly supported ( 15- compliance versus +95 the other browsers )
. completely absent in WHATWG and WC3 HTML5 working groups ( until recently , with a lightly participation )
. canvas not supported and no formal plans to support this and the other HTML5 main features
. etc
. etc

I don&#039;t like to say it, but it is game over for Internet Explorer, the web won ( silverlight, active x, propietary extensions, un-commoditazion of protocols are gone ).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsot is not interested in the progress of HTML 5. Examples:</p>
<p>. SVG not supported<br />
. ACID 3 terribly supported ( 15- compliance versus +95 the other browsers )<br />
. completely absent in WHATWG and WC3 HTML5 working groups ( until recently , with a lightly participation )<br />
. canvas not supported and no formal plans to support this and the other HTML5 main features<br />
. etc<br />
. etc</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like to say it, but it is game over for Internet Explorer, the web won ( silverlight, active x, propietary extensions, un-commoditazion of protocols are gone ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/09/fall-2009-web-browser-outlook/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdeepwell.com/?p=136#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Feel free to write a summary of what the Midori developers are doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feel free to write a summary of what the Midori developers are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/09/fall-2009-web-browser-outlook/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdeepwell.com/?p=136#comment-22</guid>
		<description>What about Midori?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Midori?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igorette (igorette) 's status on Tuesday, 29-Sep-09 19:55:28 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/09/fall-2009-web-browser-outlook/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Igorette (igorette) 's status on Tuesday, 29-Sep-09 19:55:28 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markdeepwell.com/?p=136#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/09/fall-2009-web-browser-outlook/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/09/fall-2009-web-browser-outlook/" rel="nofollow">http://www.markdeepwell.com/2009/09/fall-2009-web-browser-outlook/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

